Art and Your Health

A couple days ago, I met up with a friend (socially distanced, of course). I was wearing one of my old Nutcracker cast sweatshirts (I was in the Atlanta Ballet's Nutcracker for four years when I was a kid). My friend commented on the shirt, and we talked about the year that she had also auditioned for the same production. She was 12. She was rejected because, as one kind judge put it, "you're too good-looking." The children's choreographer, who was more blunt, elaborated, "you're too mature-looking," and finally, when this 12 year old still didn't understand, "your breasts are too big."

Obviously, my friend was very upset by this at the time, and still remembers the sting of being turned away from a production she desperately wanted to be in, for a reason that she couldn't do anything about.

Later, as a 20-year-old college student, she was in a dance class and realized, watching in the mirror as her short, curvy self danced in a line with taller, willowy ballerinas, that, yes, the visual difference between herself and other dancers did disrupt the line and flow of the choreography. She said that realizing this for herself as a college student - realizing that she couldn’t "fit" in a professional dance company - was hard, but also drastically different than being told at 12 that your body is a problem.

As another curvy former ballerina, I completely understand this. “Curvy” is being kind - I was fat. (No, this isn't body shaming, fat shaming, etc. When you're 11 years old, not quite five feet tall, and weigh 111 pounds, you're fat no matter how you slice it.) My ballet teacher who, yes, was the same blunt children's choreographer from that audition, always gave me grief about my weight.

Most of the girls at my ballet school started pointe (dancing in toe shoes) at 11. My teacher had me wait a year; she said my ankles weren't strong enough to support all my weight on my toes. Not that I was any better at 12. For some strange reason, I gained approximately 10 pounds a year in middle school - weighing 111 at 11, 123 at 12, and 132 at 13.

Miss Joanne might have had a point, as hard as it was for me to hear. I destroyed my ankles; after a year on pointe, I had not progressed in my pointe work. Rather, I had gotten to where I could not rise up onto my toes without pulling myself up on the barre.

I also neglected to mention that the year I was 12 was the last year I danced in the Atlanta Ballet's Nutcracker, and the last year that my sister and I attended their ballet school. We didn't get into the Nutcracker the next year and, rather than continuing to drive almost an hour four days a week (between the two of us) to class, we found a new ballet school closer to home.

This was also around the time that girls my age were deciding whether to continue in the pre-professional classes - four, five, and eventually six days a week with the intention of one day auditioning for a professional dance company and making this a career. There would be no time for any other activities - I would have to drop drama club, which I had been in for a couple years.

Ankles aside, this was about the time I started to notice differences between me and some of the other girls in my class. They were thin. Some were too thin. Some of them were already talking about how all they ate between breakfast and going home to dinner - late, after all their dance classes - was low fat yogurt and an apple.

I didn't really understand yet what eating disorders were. But I also knew that 1. I couldn't commit to that kind of lifestyle, and 2. it wasn't healthy.

Around the time I turned 14, toward the end of 8th grade, unable to dance on pointe, and unwilling to drastically change my lifestyle in order to do so, I decided that I would drop ballet and instead continue with theatre.

Dance - ballet in particular - is one of those arts that's known for the extremes the artists push themselves to. To some extent, it's necessary. The human body wasn't designed to support 150 pounds on a single toe; some people can make it work with 90, though.

But dance isn't the only art that seems to produce health issues. There is, of course, the whole concept of the starving artist; the person who is so dedicated to their art that they live in poverty and squalor, making art rather than money, neglecting their health, burning their manuscript to stay warm, and dying tragically young. It's not just something you see in an opera. Jonathan Larson, creator of Rent, died younger than I am now. The night before his magnum opus was to open, he collapsed on his kitchen floor with an aortic aneurysm - something that could have been prevented had he seen a doctor in the past decade, which of course he couldn't afford to do, even working full time as a waiter.

Jim Henson died of abscesses in his lungs because he was “too busy” to go to the doctor for the flu.

And these are looked on and admired as the great tragic artists of our time. They gave all for their art.

On the other hand you have Stephen King. Prolific author, has "made it big," and is still alive and kicking. Is he less of an artist because he's still OK?

There came a time that I had to decide between theatre - and by theatre, I mean working 3 part-time jobs, driving a car held together by duct tape and mold, going to auditions but never getting called back, living with my parents, having no health insurance - and getting a full time job so that I could live something better than an abjectly miserable existence. Did that make me less of an artist than those I know who did continue with that starving artist lifestyle?

I've been writing for years. I still don't dedicate the time to it that I "should." I've been to conferences and workshops, taken classes, and read books on how to be a novelist. Many authors - so many authors - suggest staying up late, after everyone goes to bed, to write, or getting up before dawn to write... or both. And... I can't. I have insomnia. I have anxiety. I had post-partum depression not quite a year ago. (Oh, yeah, I also have a toddler.)

Sleep is non-negotiable. My own nutrition is non-negotiable. My picky, teething 16-month old's nutrition and physical therapy are non-negotiable.

Does my putting my well-being, and that of my daughter ahead of my writing make me less of an artist? Maybe. But if I never finish my novel, if I live to see my daughter grow up, if I live a decent life in comfort and good health and never publish another story... if those are the only choices, then I'll live with that.

12-year-old me and my 8-year-old sister in all our mid-90’s giant sweatshirt glory.

12-year-old me and my 8-year-old sister in all our mid-90’s giant sweatshirt glory.

Dream Stories

I have chronic insomnia. Every few months, my current sleep medication stops working and my doctor and I have to try something new.

Often, the first few days on a new sleep medication bring interesting and/or epic dreams. I often wake up from these dreams thinking, "wow, what a cool idea for a story." (Usually. Sometimes I have dreams about wild boars and zombie babies, or kids in my library story time getting machine gunned behind a shower curtain. I'm not on either of those medications anymore.)

The problem with stories based on dreams is that dreams don't have to make sense, characters don't have to behave logically, etc. Or there might be an emotional energy that you want to explore, but it's problematic in some way - in a way that, as a writer thinking about publishing logistics, you worry will be hard to translate to the page and/or potentially alienate your audience. Those dreams are hard to adapt.

I also worry about telling people "this story is based on a dream," - are they going to point out that Twilight was, too?

I actually have two stories with the potential to be longer - probably novel length - that are "based" on dreams. When I say "based" on I mean that a single scene, a single emotional moment was presented to me in a dream, and I've built a world and a plot around that scene or moment. One of them is quite good, if I do say so myself. The main reason I haven't sat down to start writing the meat of the story is that I already have three partial novels that have been sitting unfinished in my computer for a decade. I need to make some progress on one of them before I pick up another long-term, large scale project.

The other one... well, it's one of those problematic ones. It's based on an emotional moment I found fascinating, but I'm not sure how well it would translate to a broader audience. But, like I said, I have other projects that need my attention more, so for now that one's on the back burner. Further back that the back burner actually - that one's on the back splash.

Asking the Hard Questions

I've been mulling over what writing project to work on for a while now.  I've been in the process of rereading my 3 partial novels and weighing things like which I have written more for vs. which I would need to rewrite more for.  Sadly, it looks like the answer to previous comparison is the same piece.  

My 90+ page novel that I have been working on for about 6 1/2 years now (Bright Fire) is also the one that has the clunkiest writing, the most tangled narrative, the worst logic issues, and the longest passages of "telling not showing."*  I'm not done rereading this one, but I can already tell that it's going to take the most rewriting by far, and given that I have a 81 page partial novel (The Wolf and the Sheath) that's also going to need a good amount of rewriting, that's saying a lot.

I think part of why I'm still clinging to BF, is that several years ago I took about 10-15 pages of it to a workshop.  The response was overwhelmingly positive - glowing, even.  I think I got my head so wrapped around the fact that people thought those 15 pages were really good that I lost sight of a major factor: 15 pages of good material doesn't make up for another 75 of knotted mess.

I started going to a writing critique group last weekend.  I brought a short story I wrote about a year ago that is, with the exception of a couple minor tweaks, publishing-ready.  And, again, the response was overwhelming.  Between that and the fact that I am now also trying to plan a wedding and have to allow time in the week for that on top of my "real" job and writing, I kind of started to look at this a different way.  

Writing time is going to be a precious commodity from here on out, at least for the next several months.  Do I really want to spend all my writing time trying to fix something that is, in all likelihood, going to frustrate me a lot, for the sake of 15 stellar pages?  Or do I want to work on a piece that I haven't felt as daunted by, that is almost as long, that probably also has at least 15 good strong pages in it, and, even though it needs rewriting as well, doesn't have the depth of problems that Bright Fire has?

I have to remind myself that just because a peice I shared with a group is good, doesn't mean that another peice I haven't had feedback on yet isn't.  It may be time to accept that in order to actually make progress on something, I have to back away from the peice I've been so focused on for so long.  I'm not saying I won't work on BF one day, and I'm not saying I've definitely decided to workshop W & S instead.  I still want to finish rereading BF - maybe something just past where I am now will spark my imagination and inspire me to work on it anyway.  I also want to reread Brinyor (my third and shortest novel), even though it's only been a year since I was last working on that one.  I want to make sure I give all three the same amount of attention and contemplating before making the decision to work on what I hope to make my main project for the next several months.

So now I just have to ask myself the hard questions: even though I'm more emotionally invested in Bright Fire, is it the best thing for me to be doing right now?  Am I going to dread coming home and sitting down to the keyboard?  Am I going to drag my feet and find ways to stall the actual rewriting process?  I'm going to think about these long and hard after I finish rereading and then we'll see.

*In writing, you are supposed to "show, don't tell."  You show the action.  You show the characters' emotions by describing what their faces look like or what about their stance or fidgeting gives their emotions away.  This isn't Shakespeare where the king gets killed offstage and someone comes in and tells the audience about it.  (That's not mean to be a knock to Shakespeare.)